Showcasing what's happening in healthcare ... around the corner and around the world. Not your usual conference.

register -  login
Participate
present
register
People
presenters >>>
whois? >>>
Topics Pages
ageing >>>
int.med. >>>
nursing >>>
mh and a >>>
c and a >>>
e and e >>>
chronic >>>
obesity >>>
the Conference
details
vision
manifesto
funding
Table of Contents
topic pages >>>
presentations >>>
presenters >>>
site map >>>
 

Would you like to present your work, promote your product, publicize your service? contact Gloria more

The Myth and Adam Smith

Should Canadians be able to use after-tax dollars to purchase health services that are already covered under the provincial health plans schedule of benefits?

mrachlis

W
e already have the solutions to most of the apparently intractable problems facing our health care system. However, we don’t usually hear about them. The most commonly offered remedies are a lot more money and privatization... The first step is to avoid the siren calls for market solutions.>

Our twenty-year blind love affair with the private sector seems to be on the wane; but a number of Canadians still believe that you only have to replace the word ‘‘public’’ or ‘‘non-profit’’ with ‘‘for-profit’’ and you have automatically made something 15 per cent more efficient. Adam Smith knew this was a myth over two hundred years ago, but that doesn’t stop some modern-day economist wannabes from claiming that if we lift the regulatory shackles, the market’s invisible hand will erase all human woes.

Markets are the most efficient mechanism to provide most goods and services, but all markets require a court system to enforce contracts. And most businesses require some form of public-policy framework. Governments regulate capital acquisition through stock markets because otherwise charlatans will beat out honest financiers. Honourable manufacturers can’t compete with those that are willing to pollute the environment or reduce labour standards. Business needs government environmental and labour regulations to maintain a level playing field.

Furthermore, markets just don’t deal effectively with some goods and services. For example, we publicly fund and administer fire services. We don’t rely upon people to purchase firefighting insurance. What if everyone but one on the block had such insurance and his house caught on fire? Would we wait until the fire moved to someone else’s house before we called the firefighters? And would different fire services compete with each other? It sounds like a nightmare.

 

links to other presentations by Dr. Rachlis

 

What do you think ? Dr. Rachlis would like to hear from you ...

Please use the "comment" box below to respond ...

 

Add your comment

Your name:
Your email:
Subject:
Comment:
 

Would you like to present your work, promote your product, publicize your service? contact Gloria more